Decarbonization Potentials for Automotive Supply Chains: Emission-Intensity Pathways of Carbon-Intensive Hotspots of Battery Electric Vehicles
-
Published:2023-07-31
Issue:15
Volume:15
Page:11795
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Poschmann Justus12ORCID, Bach Vanessa2ORCID, Finkbeiner Matthias2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Volkswagen AG, Group Strategy Sustainability, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany 2. Chair of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technical University of Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
To keep global warming below 1.5 °C, the road transport sector must decrease its emissions by substituting internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) with battery electric vehicles (BEV). As BEVs can be operated with renewable electricity, the CO2−eq emissions of the supply chain are relevant for future mitigation. The aim of this paper is to derive emission-intensity pathways and to determine the decarbonization impact regarding the lifecycle emissions of BEVs. Therefore, an analysis for steel, aluminum, battery cells, plastic, and glass, and an evaluation of the literature containing present emission intensities (e.g., for steel 1.7 tCO2/t to 2.8 tCO2/t) and reduction potentials, were performed. Based on low-carbon electricity, circular materials, and recycling, as well as technological improvements, emission intensities can be decreased by 69% to 91% by 2050. As a result, the carbon footprint of the reviewed vehicles can be reduced by 47% for supply chain emissions, whereas 25% to 37% of the total lifecycle emissions remain. Considering the scenario studied, BEVs cannot be decarbonized aligned to the 1.5 °C pathway using only avoidance and reduction measures until 2050. Consequently, the application of carbon removals is necessary. However, the applied trajectory and extrapolation relies on material availability and does not consider abatement costs.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference140 articles.
1. Wunderling, N., Winkelmann, R., Rockström, J., Loriani, S., Armstrong-McKay, D., Ritchie, P., Sakschewski, B., and Donges, J. (2022). Global Warming Overshoots Increase Risk of Triggering Climate Tipping Points and Cascades, Springer Nature. 2. Core Writing Team, Lee, H., and Romero, J. (2023). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. 3. Weiss, D., Grüning, C., van Ackern, P., Kriege, K., Buderath, M., Dovidat, L., Adelphi, Jungmichel, N., Aron, M., and Systain Consulting GmbH (2022). Umweltrisiken und—Auswirkungen in Globalen Lieferketten Deutscher Unternehmen—Branchenstudie Automobilindustrie, Umweltbundesamt. 4. Sustainability analysis of the electric vehicle use in Europe for CO2 emissions reduction;Nieto;J. Clean. Prod.,2016 5. The electric vehicle and renewable energy: Changes in boundary conditions that enhance business model innovations;Costa;J. Clean. Prod.,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|