Beneficial Microorganisms in the Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle and Swine Excreta

Author:

Vidal-Espinosa Paulina-Soledad1ORCID,Alvarez-Vera Manuel12,Cárdenas Andrés12,Cobos-Torres Juan-Carlos12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador

2. Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador

Abstract

The accumulation of solid organic waste is reaching critical levels in almost all regions of the world. It must be managed sustainably to avoid the depletion of natural resources, minimize risks to human health, reduce environmental burdens, and maintain an overall balance in the ecosystem. This research focuses on the anaerobic digestion of bovine and swine excreta with and without applying beneficial microorganisms as a viable option for recycling agricultural solid wastes. Three greenhouse gases (GHGs)—methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia—produced by cattle and swine excreta that were treated with and without beneficial microorganisms in bioreactors were quantified. A monitoring and gas concentration measurement system was implemented inside the bioreactors. The behavior of the GHGs and the efficiency of the beneficial microorganisms in treating the farm animal waste were analyzed according to the phases of anaerobic digestion. Average reductions in the concentration in units of ppm of CH4 during the composting process of 46.95% and 34.48% were observed for the cattle and swine excreta treatments, respectively. It was concluded that the studied GHGs had different behaviors in the anaerobic digestion of the treatments in cattle and swine excreta with and without beneficial microorganisms due to the different types of feeding. However, it must be emphasized that beneficial microorganisms are an essential tool for reducing GHGs in anaerobic digestion.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference59 articles.

1. Ropero-Portillo, S. (2023, April 06). ¿Las Vacas Contaminan?. Available online: https://www.ecologiaverde.com/las-vacas-contaminan-3233.html.

2. Consideraciones Ambientales de La Intensificación En Producción Animal;Herrero;Ecol. Austral,2008

3. Impacts of Waste from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations on Water Quality;Burkholder;Environ. Health Perspect.,2007

4. De Blas, C., García-Rebollar, P., Cambra-López, M., and Torres, A.G. (2008). XXIV Curso de Especialización FEDNA, Editorial FEDNA.

5. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T.D., Castel, V., Rosales, M., Rosales, M., and de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3