In Cahoots with Neo-Indigenism

Author:

Haley Brian D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Oneonta, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA

Abstract

Academia’s support for neo-indigenes is a significant component of their professional success. I describe how this support operates, drawing a model of cahooting from Edward Dolnick’s analysis of art forgery in The Forger’s Spell. Cahooting reflects the importance of social relationships to the construction of perceived truth and virtue. It corrupts academia at multiple levels through these relationships, undermining the pursuit of truth and goals of equity and inclusion.

Funder

United University Professions

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference67 articles.

1. Astor, Maggie (New York Times, 2018). Why Many Native Americans Are Angry with Elizabeth Warren, New York Times.

2. Bancroft, Hubert H. (1964). California Pioneer Register and Index, 1542–1848, Regional Publishing Co.

3. Barnes, Barry (1985). About Science, B. Blackwell.

4. Barth, Fredrik (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, Little, Brown.

5. Johnson, Randal (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Columbia University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3