DNA Ancestry Testing and Racial Discourse in Higher Education: How the (Re)Biologization of Race (Un)Settles Monoracialism for Graduate Students

Author:

Mohajeri Orkideh1ORCID,Johnston-Guerrero Marc P.2ORCID,Foeman Anita3,Lawton Bessie3

Affiliation:

1. Educational Leadership & Higher Education Administration, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA

2. Educational Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

3. Communication & Media, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA

Abstract

The recent proliferation of DNA testing in both popular culture and higher education calls to question whether such testing reifies race as a biological construct and, in particular, whether or not it disrupts or reinforces monoracial categorizations. Graduate students, who are often at a point in their educational journeys to further question and critique commonly held ideas, provide a unique lens through which to investigate discourses surrounding DNA testing. In this qualitative study, we analyze data from four focus groups with 22 racially diverse U.S. graduate students who had recently completed an ancestry test. We identify two specific discourses that graduate student participants engaged in, including (a) a biological race discourse and (b) an agentic choice discourse. Together, these discourses produced distinct unsettled subjectivities for Black and White participants. Our findings suggest the need to more critically consider the usage of DNA ancestry testing in and out of higher education and to provide further nuance around the validity of these tests as they relate to the social construction of race.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference78 articles.

1. What DNA can’t tell: Problems with using genetic tests to determine the nationality of migrants;Abel;Anthropology Today,2018

2. ACPA-College Student Educators International, and NASPA-Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education (2023, April 12). Professional Competency Areas for Student Affairs Educators [Report]. Available online: https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/ACPA_NASPA_Professional_Competencies_FINAL.pdf.

3. American Anthropological Association (1998). Statement of ‘Race’. American Anthropologist, 100, 712–13.

4. On being racially enough: A duoethnography across minoritized racial identities;Ashlee;International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,2021

5. Benjamin, Ruha (2019). Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life, Duke University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3