Affiliation:
1. Adam Smith Business School, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G128QQ, UK
Abstract
This paper offers a game-theoretic model of a firm that raises funds for financing an innovative business project and chooses between ICO (initial coin offering) and equity financing. The model is based on information problems associated with both ICO and equity financing well-documented in the literature. Several new features are introduced, for example, information complexity, which is analyzed along with a more traditional imperfect information and an asymmetric information approach. The model provides several implications that have not yet been tested. For example, we find that the message complexity can be beneficial for firms conducting ICOs. Also, high-quality projects can use ICO as a signal of quality. Thirdly, the average size of projects undertaking equity financing is larger than that of firms conducting ICO.
Reference58 articles.
1. Corporate Financing Decisions When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have;Myers;J. Financ. Econ.,1984
2. Adverse Selection and Capital Structure: Evidence from Venture Capital;Cumming;Entrep. Theory Pract.,2006
3. Outside Entrepreneurial Capital;Cosh;Econ. J.,2009
4. Ofir, M., and Sadeh, I. (Vanderbilt J. Transnatl. Law, 2019). ICO vs IPO: Empirical Findings, Information Asymmetry and the Appropriate Regulatory Framework, Vanderbilt J. Transnatl. Law, forthcoming.
5. Digital tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin offerings;Benedetti;J. Corp. Financ.,2021