Deciphering the Innovation Subsidy Puzzle: Government Choices amid Supply Chain Encroachment

Author:

Wang Jinglve1,Yuan Hongping2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China

2. School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Abstract

Although the impact of government subsidies on private innovation has been widely recognized and researched in numerous studies, few have considered the increasingly prevalent phenomenon of supply chain encroachment in their analysis. This paper explores this phenomenon through a game-theoretic model that takes into account a government entity, a supplier, and a manufacturer. The primary aim is to understand how the government can make optimal subsidy decisions when the supplier moves into the supply chain. Several interesting conclusions have been drawn: (1) under governmental innovation subsidies, the supplier will raise the price of the new technology to obtain more potential revenue, which is termed the inverse wholesale price effect; (2) different kinds of innovation subsidies are shown to have varied effects on R&D, production, and consumption behavior; and (3) different subsidy strategies are made compatible with the characteristics of innovative activities to maximize social welfare as much as possible. These findings shed light on inconsistent results surrounding the impacts of government subsidies on private innovations in the existing literature, providing municipalities with helpful guidance when encouraging private innovation initiatives amid supply chain encroachment.

Funder

Shaanxi Provincial Innovation Capacity Support Plan for 2023

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference66 articles.

1. Quality Investment, and the Contract Manufacturer’s Encroachment;Cui;Eur. J. Oper. Res.,2019

2. (2022, August 08). Anyron Copeman Microsoft’s Surface Thriving after 10 Years, Proving Doubters Wrong. Available online: https://www.techadvisor.com/article/790019/microsoft-surface-10-year-anniversary.html.

3. Dolata, U. (2017). Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market Concentration—Competition—Innovation Strategies, University of Stuttgart.

4. Dynamic Capabilities at Samsung: Optimizing Internal Co-Opetition;Song;Calif. Manag. Rev.,2016

5. Manufacturer Encroachment and Product Assortment under Vertical Differentiation;Zhang;Eur. J. Oper. Res.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3