Abstract
Tree stem CO2 efflux (Es) can be substantial and the factors controlling ecosystem-level Es are required to fully understand the carbon cycle and construct models that predict atmospheric CO2 dynamics. The majority of Es studies used woody lignophyte trees as the model species. Applying these lignophyte data to represent all tree forms can be inaccurate. The Es of 318 arborescent species was quantified in a common garden setting and the results were sorted into four stem growth forms: cycads, palms, monocot trees that were not palms, and woody lignophyte trees. The woody trees were comprised of gymnosperm and eudicot species. The Es did not differ among the cycads, palms, and non-palm monocots. Lignophyte trees exhibited Es that was 40% greater than that of the other stem growth forms. The Es of lignophyte gymnosperm trees was similar to that of lignophyte eudicot trees. This extensive species survey indicates that the Es from lignophyte tree species do not align with the Es from other tree growth forms. Use of Es estimates from the literature can be inaccurate for understanding the carbon cycle in tropical forests, which contain numerous non-lignophyte tree species.
Funder
United States Forest Service
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Book review;Biological Conservation;2022-04