Effect of Different Herbicides on Development and Productivity of Sweet White Lupine (Lupinus albus L.)
Author:
Juhász Csaba1, Mendler-Drienyovszki Nóra2, Magyar-Tábori Katalin2, Radócz László1ORCID, Zsombik László2
Affiliation:
1. Kerpely Kálmán Doctoral School of Crop Production and Horticultural Sciences, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi St. 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary 2. Research Institute of Nyíregyháza, Institutes for Agricultural Research and Educational Farm (IAREF), University of Debrecen, P.O. Box 12, 4400 Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
Abstract
White lupine (Lupinus albus L.) is a well-known green manure crop in Hungary, but the production of seeds can be badly impacted by weeds. The sweet white lupine ‘Nelly’ was grown on acidic sandy soil, and experimental plots were treated with different herbicides. Flumioxazin (0.06 kg ha−1), pendimethalin (5 L ha−1), dimethenamid-P (1.4 L ha−1), pethoxamid (2 L ha−1), clomazone (0.2 L ha−1), metobromuron (3 L ha−1), and metribuzin (0.55 L ha−1) were applied pre-emergence (1–2 days after sowing). Imazamox was also tested and applied post-emergence (1 L ha−1) when some basal leaves were clearly distinct (BBCH 2.3). In this paper, the weed control efficiency and the phytotoxicity of herbicides applied to lupine are examined. Vegetation index datasets were collected 12 times using a manual device and 2 times using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The phytotoxicity caused by herbicides was visually assessed on several occasions throughout the breeding season. The frequency of weed occurrence per treatment was assessed. The harvested seed yields, in kg ha−1, were analyzed after the seeds were cleaned. The herbicides metribuzin and imazamox caused extensive damage to white lupine. While pendimethalin, dimethenamid-P, pethoxamid, and clomazone were outstanding in several measured indicators, the final ranking which summarizes all the variables showed that only the pethoxamid and clomazone treatments performed better than the control. Metribuzin and imazamox were highly phytotoxic to white lupine. In the future, it would be appropriate to integrate more post-emergence active substances into trials, and the pre-emergence herbicides involved in this study should be further tested.
Funder
Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary
Reference57 articles.
1. Romeo, F.V., Fabroni, S., Ballistreri, G., Muccilli, S., Spina, A., and Rapisarda, P. (2018). Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Alkaloid Extracts from Seeds of Different Genotypes of Lupinus spp.. Sustainability, 10. 2. Genus Lupinus (Fabaceae): A review of ethnobotanical, phytochemical and biological studies;Ishaq;J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,2022 3. Gabur, I., and Simioniuc, D.P. (2023). Neglected and Underutilized Crops, Academic Press. Chapter 16. 4. Spina, A., Saletti, R., Fabroni, S., Natalello, A., Cunsolo, V., Scarangella, M., Rapisarda, P., Canale, M., and Muccilli, V. (2022). Multielemental, Nutritional, and Proteomic Characterization of Different Lupinus spp. Genotypes: A Source of Nutrients for Dietary Use. Molecules, 27. 5. Pereira, A., Ramos, F., and Sanches Silva, A. (2022). Lupin (Lupinus albus L.) Seeds: Balancing the Good and the Bad and Addressing Future Challenges. Molecules, 27.
|
|