Comparing the Grain Yields and Other Properties of Old and New Wheat Cultivars
Author:
Bilandžija Darija1ORCID, Zgorelec Željka1ORCID, Galić Marija1ORCID, Grubor Mateja2ORCID, Krička Tajana2ORCID, Zdunić Zvonimir3, Bilandžija Nikola2
Affiliation:
1. Division of Agroecology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2. Division for Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3. Agricultural Institute Osijek, Južno predgrađe 17, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
Abstract
Selecting cultivars with greater biomass results in higher yields and greater carbon sequestration. Storage of atmospheric carbon in the plant/soil pool contributes not only to food security but also to mitigating climate change and other agroecological benefits. The objective of this study was to determine: (1) grain, residue, and root biomass yields; (2) harvest indexes; (3) residue-to-product ratio; (4) root-to-shoot ratio; (5) biomass carbon and nitrogen contents; and (6) C:N ratios for two new and two old winter wheat cultivars. The greatest yield difference was found between old Srpanjka (the lowest) and new Kraljica (the highest) cultivar where grain, residue, root, and total biomass yield was higher by 38%, 91%, 71%, and 64%, respectively. Total biomass was composed of 40–47% grain, 10–11% roots, 32–36% stems + leaves, 9–11% chaff, and 1–2% spindle. The range of HI was 0.45–0.53, RPR 0.91–1.25, and R:S ratio 0.12–0.13. For all cultivars, positive carbon and negative nitrogen balance within the plant pool was determined. Still, root biomass and rhizodeposition carbon remain open questions for a better understanding of agroecosystems’ C dynamics.
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference61 articles.
1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2. Watson, R.W., Noble, I.A., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N.H., Verardo, D.J., and Dokken, D.J. (2000). Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry, Cambridge University Press. 3. Bilandžija, D., Zgorelec, Ž., and Kisić, I. (2016). Influence of Tillage Practices and Crop Type on Soil CO2 Emissions. Sustainability, 8. 4. Grazing improves C and N cycling in the Northern Great Plains: A meta-analysis;Wang;Sci. Rep.,2016 5. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management;Cassman;Ambio,2002
|
|