Affiliation:
1. Center for Advanced Research in Weed Science, Department of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil
2. Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
Abstract
Brazil, the world’s largest soybean producer, owes its success to the cultivation of glyphosate-resistant (GR) cultivars. However, the soybean yields lag behind those obtained in areas managed for high productivity. Glyphosate-induced hormesis holds promise for increasing crop yields, but the potential evolution of resistance in certain weed species poses a challenge to foliar applications under field conditions. This study assessed the effects of a hormesis-inducing glyphosate dose [90 g acid equivalent (ae) ha−1] on the agronomic characteristics and yield of four GR soybean cultivars. The evaluation was conducted in field settings across various Brazilian locations, considering foliar, seed, and seed + foliar treatments. The results showed variations in dry mass, root nodules, nutrient composition, plant height, pods, and yield, primarily influenced by environmental conditions, soil quality, and, ultimately, the interaction between GR cultivars and treatments. Total dry mass consistently increased with glyphosate, with seed and seed + foliar treatments showing the most substantial increases (7–21%). All three treatments increased nodulation by up to 36% across locations and cultivars, with seed + foliar treatment causing notable increases in nodule dry mass (up to 56%), followed by seed treatment (41%). Nutrient composition, especially for N, P, Br, and Fe, displayed location-dependent variations. Plant height varied among locations and cultivars, with minimal differences between treatments. Glyphosate treatments increased pod numbers (10 to 35%) and yields (11 to 42%) of soybean in seed and seed + foliar treatments. The findings highlight the potential of glyphosate hormesis as a viable tool for improving yields of GR soybean cultivars at the field level. However, the extent of benefits depends on the agronomic conditions of location, choice of cultivars, and herbicide application method.
Funder
‘Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo—FAPESP’
Reference47 articles.
1. USDA—United States Department of Agriculture (2024, June 25). Soybean Explorer, Available online: https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/cropview/commodityView.aspx?cropid=2222000.
2. EMBRAPA—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2024, June 25). Soja em Números (Safra 2022/23). Available online: https://www.embrapa.br/soja/cultivos/soja1/dados-economicos.
3. Soybean yield gap in the areas of yield contest in Brazil;Battisti;Int. J. Plant Prod.,2018
4. Integrated weed management systems with herbicide-tolerant crops in the European Union: Lessons learnt from home and abroad;Lamichhane;Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.,2017
5. Kontogiannatos, D., Kourti, A., and Ferreira, K.F. (2020). Herbicide resistance in Brazil: Status, impacts, and future challenges. Pests, Weeds and Diseases in Agricultural Crop and Animal Husbandry Production, IntechOpen.