Crop Productivity, Phytochemicals, and Bioactivities of Wild and Grown in Controlled Environment Slender Amaranth (Amaranthus viridis L.)
Author:
Cunha-Chiamolera Tatiana Pagan Loeiro da1, Chileh-Chelh Tarik2ORCID, Urrestarazu Miguel1ORCID, Ezzaitouni Mohamed2ORCID, López-Ruiz Rosalía3, Gallón-Bedoya Manuela4ORCID, Rincón-Cervera Miguel Á.2, Guil-Guerrero José L.2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Vegetal Production Division, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain 2. Food Technology Division, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain 3. Department Chemistry-Physics, Analytical Chemistry of Contaminants, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain 4. Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia, Medellin Campus, Carrera 65 No. 59A-110, Medellín 050034, Colombia
Abstract
Amaranthus viridis L. is a wild edible plant that occasionally is cultivated as an alternative crop because of its interest as a functional food and its adaptation to high-saline soils. In this work, leaves from A. viridis were compared with their grown in controlled environment (GCE) counterparts in a soilless system at electrical conductivities (EC) and different light exposures for assessing growth parameters, moisture, total phenolic and total flavonoid content, phenolic compound profiles, vitamin C, antioxidant activity, and antiproliferative activity against the HT–29 human colorectal cancer cell line. The highest biomass production was obtained using EC of 2.5 dS m−1 and the AP67 Milk LED lamp. Vitamin C in wild samples ranged from 83.1 to 104.9 mg 100 g−1 fresh weight (fw), and in GCE ones, it ranged from 112.3 to 236.7 mg 100 g−1 fw. Measured by the DPPH and ABTS assays, the antioxidant activity was higher in wild than in GCE plants: the ranges for wild samples were in the 1.8–4.9 and 2.0–3.9 mmol of Trolox Equivalent (TE) 100 g−1 dry weight (dw) ranges, and for GCE ones in the 1.3–1.9 and 1.5–2.2 mmol TE 100 g−1 dw ranges, respectively. As for phenolic compounds, in wild samples, the range was from 14.65 to 22.70 mg 100 g−1 fw, and these amounts were much higher than those found in their GCE counterparts, in which the range was from 2.58 to 5.95 mg 100 g−1 fw. In wild plants three compounds, namely trans-p-coumaric acid, isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside, and nicotiflorin, accounted for more than half of the total quantified phenolic compounds. The MTT assay revealed concentration- and time-dependent inhibitory effects on HT–29 cells for all checked extracts. Cancer cells were less influenced by extracts from GCE plants, which showed higher GI50 compared to wild plants. This work improves knowledge on the growth parameters, phytochemical profiles, and biological activities of wild and GCE A. viridis.
Funder
Vice-Rectorate of Scientific Policy of the University of Almería
Reference70 articles.
1. Motti, R. (2021). Wild plants used as herbs and spices in Italy: An ethnobotanical review. Plants, 10. 2. Sánchez-Mata, M., and Tardío, J. (2016). Ethnobotanical and food composition monographs of selected Mediterranean wild edible plants. Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants, Springer. 3. The genus Amaranthus in Southern Africa;Brenan;J. S. Afr. Bot.,1981 4. Grubben, G.J.H., and Denton, O.A. (2004). Amaranthus viridis L. PROTA4U, PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa). Available online: http://www.prota4u.org. 5. Present Biological Status of Potential Medicinal Plant of Amaranthus viridis: A Comprehensive Review;Am. J. Clin. Med.,2015
|
|