Managing Bacterial Spot of Tomato: Do Chemical Controls Pay Off?

Abstract

Bacterial spot of tomato (BST) is a disease that severely afflicts tomato crops, especially in geographic areas such as the Southeastern U.S., where the environmental conditions favor rapid disease development. Farmers usually use chemical treatments such as copper–mancozeb mixtures and acibenzolar-S-methyl, among other methods, to manage BST. However, these chemical treatments generally fail to improve marketable yields, thus raising the question of whether the BST treatments are economical. We evaluated the efficacy and profitability of bactericide treatments consisting of copper-mancozeb, acibenzolar-S-methyl, and streptomycin, as well as three inoculation levels of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. perforans, on the management of BST in Florida. Across three separate field trials, BST severity was inversely correlated with marketable tomato yields; however, bactericide treatments provided no statistical improvement in marketable yields. By accounting for yield and the BST treatment costs, our profitability analysis showed that the BST treatments did not pay off economically; the net returns of these treatments were statistically equivalent to the untreated controls.