Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Organic Manure Composting: The Effect of Membrane Cover
Author:
Varga Zsolt István12, Shahzad Shaghil1, Ramay Muhammad Wajahat1, Damak Mariem12ORCID, Gulyás Miklós1ORCID, Béres András13, Gyuricza Csaba1, Székács András13ORCID, Aleksza László12
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly u. 1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary 2. Profikomp Environmental Technologies Inc., Kühne Ede u. 7, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary 3. Agrotechnology National Laboratory, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly u. 1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary
Abstract
The current scientific literature predominantly focuses on pilot-scale studies concerning the effectiveness of membrane covers in reducing gas emissions during cattle manure composting. Our study centers on the application of a leading market commercial membrane cover (ePTE-TEXcomm) and a locally manufactured one (ProfiCover®) at industrial processing levels, evaluating their efficacy in mitigating gas emission during the fifth day of the thermophilic phase. Taking into account material inhomogeneities, work environment impact, and efficiency, the results are characteristic of industrial-scale processes rarely discussed in the scientific literature. Our results, obtained with a portable gas sampler and FTIR spectroscopy measurements using corresponding standards, indicate that ePTE-TEXcomm manifested a reduction of 90.8% for NH3 and 59.6% for CO2. CH4 emissions increased, suggesting their potential entrapment. N2O and propane equivalent experienced reductions of 23.1% and 44.8%, respectively. On the other hand, ProfiCover® presented emission reductions for NH3 and CO2 of 93.3% and 85.9%, respectively. CH4, contrasting with ePTE-TEXcomm, showed a significant reduction of 55.6%. N2O and propane equivalent followed with reductions of 56.7% and 84.5%, respectively. All of this divergence in performance implies a potential trade-off in emission reduction efficacy between the covers. Knowledge sharing between researchers and industry partners is key to translating these technologies into widespread adoption.
Funder
Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office Development of the Agrotechnology National Laboratory National Research, Development and Innovation Fund Flagship Research Groups Program 2024 of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Greenhouse gas emissions during cattle feedlot manure composting;Hao;J. Environ. Qual.,2001 2. Emission of volatile organic compounds from composting of different solid wastes: Abatement by biofiltration;Pagans;J. Hazard. Mater.,2006 3. Monteny, G.J., and Hartung, E. (2007). Turnover and losses of NH3 during manure composting: A critical review. Ammonia Emissions in Agriculture, Wageningen Academic Publishers. 4. Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from composting;Nordahl;Environ. Sci. Technol.,2023 5. Li, M., Li, S., Chen, S., Meng, Q., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Shi, L., Ding, F., Zhu, J., and Ma, R. (2023). Measures for controlling gaseous emissions during composting: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.
|
|