Survey-Based Studies of the Agility Construct in the Healthcare Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Sarmiento Falla Jorge Flavio1ORCID,Karwowski Waldemar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA

Abstract

As a dynamic capability, agility has been extensively examined within manufacturing settings due to the industry’s dynamics and the imperative for rapid adaptation to unforeseen market changes. Similarly, service sectors such as healthcare also confront significant unpredictability, underscoring the necessity for agile capacities. Furthermore, healthcare organizations may require guidance in formulating strategies to enhance their agility. This study systematically appraised peer-reviewed empirical investigations centered on agility within the healthcare domain. This assessment delved into the various degrees of agility scrutinized in healthcare-focused research, the methodologies employed, the facets of agility assessed in each study, and their correlations with other factors. The study adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The insights from the analysis identified four predominant categorizations of agility within healthcare entities: organizational agility, workforce agility, supply chain agility, and treatment agility. While diverse survey instruments have been used to gauge agility, certain consistent themes emerge across the dimensions and items of these tools. The reviewed empirical frameworks predominantly concentrate on organizational and supply chain agility, leaving the constructs of workforce and treatment agility as fertile grounds for further explorations.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference71 articles.

1. Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability;Arena;Organ. Dyn.,2017

2. A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes;Sherehiy;Int. J. Ind. Ergon.,2007

3. Supply chain agility: A systematic review of definitions, enablers and performance implications;Shi;Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag.,2020

4. Nagel, R., and Dove, R. (1991). 21ST Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy. Volume 2. Infrastructure, Iaccoca Institute, Lehigh University.

5. Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., and Preiss, K. (1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3