Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
2. Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
3. Department of Medicine, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, 12006 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 46002 Valencia, Spain
Abstract
Objective: A cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) is performed to avoid potential damage to the newborn. It is, therefore, crucial to develop an accurate prediction model that can anticipate, prior to labor, which fetus may be at risk of presenting this condition. Material and Methods: To calculate a prediction model for IFC, the clinical, epidemiological, and ultrasonographic variables of 538 patients admitted to the maternity of La Fe Hospital were studied and evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, using the area under the curve (AUC) and the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Results: In the univariable analysis, CPR MoM was the best single parameter for the prediction of CS for IFC (OR 0.043, p < 0.0001; AUC 0.72, p < 0.0001). Concerning the multivariable analysis, for the general population, the best prediction model (lower AIC) included the CPR multiples of the median (MoM), the maternal age, height, and parity, the smoking habits, and the type of labor onset (spontaneous or induction) (AUC 0.80, p < 0.0001). In contrast, for the pregnancies undergoing labor induction, the best prediction model included the CPR MoM, the maternal height and parity, and the smoking habits (AUC 0.80, p < 0.0001). None of the models included estimated fetal weight (EFW). Conclusions: CS for IFC can be moderately predicted prior to labor using maternal characteristics and CPR MoM. A validation study is pending to apply these models in daily clinical practice.
Reference22 articles.
1. The physiology of intrapartum fetal compromise at term;Turner;Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,2020
2. Pathophysiological interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings in clinical practice;Jia;Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,2023
3. Fetal monitoring in labour: Summary and update of NICE guidance;McAllister;BMJ,2022
4. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): Use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics;Bhide;Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.,2021
5. Novillo-Del Álamo, B., Martínez-Varea, A., Satorres-Pérez, E., Nieto-Tous, M., Bello-Martínez de Velasco, S., García-Florenciano, M.V., Padilla-Prieto, C., Modrego-Pardo, F., and Morales-Roselló, J. (2024). Cerebroplacental Ratio as a Predictive Factor of Emergency Cesarean Sections for Intrapartum Fetal Compromise: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med., 13.