Abstract
Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Egg Farmers of Canada
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference160 articles.
1. The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues;Tomislav;Zagreb Int. Rev. Econ. Bus.,2018
2. CCA (2020, October 07). Climate Change Act 2008, Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents.
3. ECCC (2019). Achieving a Sustainable Future, ECCC.
4. (2020, October 07). EC Sustainable Development—Environment—European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/sustainable-development/index_en.htm.
5. The BRICS and Africa’s search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development;Gu;Energy Policy,2018
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献