Abstract
Many methods for evaluating the aquifer’s vulnerability to pollution have been developed in the past four decades by using geographic information system (GIS) tools. However, even if the aquifer vulnerability concept is well defined and the methods have been constantly tested and compared, the problem of the choice of the best “standard” method remains. To meet these objectives, aquifer vulnerability maps are of crucial importance. The choice of method depends on several factors, including the scale of the project, the hydrogeological characteristics of the area, and data availability. Among the many methods, the AVI (Aquifer Vulnerability Index) method has been widely used as it considers only two physical parameters. The AVI Index represents the hydraulic resistance of an aquifer to vertical flow, as a ratio between the thickness of each sedimentary unit above the uppermost aquifer (D, length), and the estimated hydraulic conductivity (K, length/time) of each of these layers. The AVI Index has a time dimension and is divided into five classes. In order to avoid a widespread presence of the higher vulnerability classes, especially in shallow aquifers, the AVI classification has been modified using statistical methods. The study reports the application of the modified AVI method for groundwater pollution vulnerability, in three different areas of southern Italy, highlighting the limitations of the method in alluvial aquifers and the differences with other methods.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference26 articles.
1. Vulnerabilité des Nappes D’eau Souterraine a la Pollution [Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination];Margat,1968
2. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report (COST action 620);Zwahlen,2004
3. Index-based groundwater vulnerability mapping models using hydrogeological settings: A critical evaluation
4. Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: A review
5. EPIK: A new method for outlining of protection areas in karstic environment;Doerfliger,1997
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献