Reflections of a First-Year Chemistry Teacher: Intersecting PCK, Responsiveness, and Inquiry Instruction

Author:

Morris Dana Lynn1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75799, USA

Abstract

Many educators agree that science instruction should be dominated by inquiry strategies, while others stress the need for responsive practices to place a focus on student learning and understanding. Some scholars believe the two approaches exist on opposite ends of an instructional spectrum, while others believe they may be aligned and intertwined. Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), the broadly accepted gold standard for science education, seems to include both. Understanding how teachers incorporate inquiry strategies and responsiveness and how the two intersect could lead to a more complete framework for K–12 science instruction and help streamline science teacher education. This qualitative single-case study examined the reflections of a first-year chemistry teacher by exploring how she demonstrated responsiveness to students while maintaining a teaching orientation of inquiry-based instruction. Results indicated that responsiveness depended on a high level of PCK and led to higher or lower levels of inquiry based on the students’ need for teacher support. Additionally, findings showed that the teacher’s stated and demonstrated beliefs about inquiry were disconnected. Finally, a gap between science conceptual understanding and mathematics PCK suggested the need to support more innovative mathematics pedagogical strategies during physical science teacher education.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference41 articles.

1. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for k-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, National Academies Press.

2. DeBoer, G. (2019). A History of Ideas in Science Education, Teachers College Press.

3. Rudolph, J.L. (2019). How We Teach Science-What′s Changed, and Why It Matters, Harvard University Press.

4. McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O., Erduran, S., and Childs, P. (2019). Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education: Selected Papers from the ESERA 2017 Conference, Springer International Publishing. Contributions from Science Education Research.

5. Levin, D., Hammer, D., Elby, A., and Coffey, J. (2012). Becoming a Responsive Science Teacher: Focusing on Student Thinking in Secondary Science, National Science Teachers Association Arlington.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3