Pure Question-Based Learning

Author:

Bälter Olle1ORCID,Glassey Richard1ORCID,Jemstedt Andreas1ORCID,Bosk Daniel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

We have evaluated a new pedagogical approach, pure question-based learning, or rather, a modern, digitized version of a really old approach: the Socratic method of learning. The pedagogical approach was evaluated and improved using a design-based research methodology. An online course was developed with pure question-based learning to explain its predecessor: question-based learning. The course was successively taken by students, researchers, and practitioners, and discussed in four group seminars. Feedback from each iteration was integrated into the next version and the course is still in use, see link below. Results from the design-based research process were positive (n≈78 participants, over four iterations) with the main negative results coming from the unfamiliarity of the format and feelings of exam-like stress during the first encounter. While pure question-based learning is new, it builds upon well-tested pedagogical methods. The method has several potential advantages: learning can be broken down into smaller modules, there is less passive learning for the students, less learning material needs to be created and AI could be used for this creation.

Funder

STINT—The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning;Lovett;J. Interact. Media Educ.,2008

2. Kaufman, J., Ryan, R., Thille, C., and Bier, N. (2013). Open Learning Initiative Courses in Community Colleges: Evidence on Use and Effectiveness, Mellon University. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344726610_Open_Learning_Initiative_Courses_in_Community_Colleges_Evidence_on_Use_and_Effectiveness?channel=doi&linkId=5f8c1f2e458515b7cf8825ed&showFulltext=true.

3. Koedinger, K.R., McLaughlin, E.A., Jia, J.Z., and Bier, N.L. (2016, January 25–29). Is the doer effect a causal relationship? How can we tell and why it’s important. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Edinburgh, UK.

4. Yarnall, L., Means, B., and Wetzel, T. (2016). Lessons Learned from Early Implementations of Adaptive Courseware, SRI Education.

5. Glassey, R., and Bälter, O. (2020, January 21–24). Put the students to work: Generating Questions with Constructive Feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3