Abstract
A possible pathway to achieve disciplinary integration is through the use of the Engineering Design (ED) process, starting with problems in a real context that enable the mobilization of concepts from various disciplinary areas. The study reported in this paper aims to analyze the performance underlying the use of the ED process in solving authentic problems in a STEAM perspective, with future teachers of elementary education. We adopted a qualitative and interpretative methodology, with an exploratory design, where data were collected through participant observation, documents, artefacts and photographic records. The results are discussed, taking into account previous research and the data collected throughout the classes, where future teachers solved a problem task and created an artefact and a poster. Preliminary results show that the participants valued the experience and were actively engaged, showing persistence and motivation in solving the problem in a collaborative way, through the different steps of the ED cycle. This approach constituted an opportunity to favor the establishment of connections between different areas, such as mathematics, sciences or arts, detecting the possibility of integrating previously learned concepts. Difficulties were evidenced in the identification of some underlying mathematical and physical sciences concepts, particularly in the mobilization of an adequate scientific language while arguing and making decisions, or in accurately justifying the need to improve the designed plan.
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference62 articles.
1. STEM integration in sixth grade: Designing and constructing paper bridges;English;Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ.,2019
2. Active learning in the middle grades;Edwards;Middle Sch. J.,2015
3. The middle school philosophy: Do we practice what we preach or do we preach something different?;Edwards;Curr. Issues Middle Level Educ.,2014
4. Nesin, G. (2012). This We Believe in Action: Implementing Successful Middle Level Schools, Association for Middle Level Education.
5. Carvalho, G.S., Palhares, P., Azevedo, F., and Parente, C. (2020). Improving Children’s Learning and Well-Being, UM-CIEC.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献