Affiliation:
1. LE@D—Laboratório de Educação a Distância e E-Learning, Universidade Aberta, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal
2. ISEC Lisboa—Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências e UIDEF—Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract
Inclusion is an unavoidable dimension of education and the school’s mission. Educational organisations must therefore seek approaches and practices that materialise in the effective management of diversity, equity and inclusion, since these are conditions for the involvement of the whole community to achieve the goals of education for all. This study sought to answer (i) How do school leaders conceptualize equity and inclusion? (ii) What guidance and administrative procedures do headteachers use to facilitate inclusion? (iii) What characterises their practices concerning leadership for equity and inclusion? The empirical focus of the research was a set of school principals of Portuguese public schools, where a qualitative methodology was used, namely the interview survey technique. The sample gathered 11 interviewees. The results show that, although from an ideological point of view, headteachers have a broad conception of inclusive education, from an operational point of view, the evidence shows the implementation of normative practices. The data point to a reproduction of Portuguese policies and their priorities, showing a leadership engaged in targets, outcomes and performance indicators. The conclusions of the article point to the need to explore new possibilities for understanding inclusion and leadership, and these understandings may impact the school’s transformation toward successful inclusion.
Funder
LE@D—Laboratory of Distance Education and E-Learning
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference63 articles.
1. Standards and competency frameworks for school administrators: Global, comparative and critical perspectives;Riveros;Educ. Policy Anal. Arch.,2019
2. Color-Blind Leadership: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of the ISLLC and ELCC Standards;Davis;Educ. Adm. Q.,2015
3. Edwards, R., and Usher, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education: Different Voices, Different Worlds, Routledge. [1st ed.].
4. Waite, D., and Bogotch, I. (2017). The Wiley International Handbook of Educational Leadership, 1st ed, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
5. Roberts, P. (2014). The Impulse Society. What Is Wrong with Getting What We Want?, Bloomsbury.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献