German and French Students’ Strategies While Performing Geographical Comparisons in a Group Task Setting

Author:

Simon Marine1ORCID,Budke Alexandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Geography Education, University of Cologne, Gronewaldstraße 2, 50931 Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Today’s challenges, such as climate change, require developing geographical literacy, which includes discussion and argumentation around scientific results. One important geographical method and competency is comparison. However, learning geographical methods, such as comparison, can be a challenge for students if they rarely solve open tasks that do not require simple answers. In this study, we analysed group discussions that took place during an intervention, aiming to develop comparison competency with 44 German and French students from the experimental group. Through the use of the documentary method, students’ main orientations and strategies to solve the open comparison tasks were reconstructed. We related the implementation of the comparison method during group discussions to students’ individual progress during the intervention and explored differences between French and German students. Results show that students’ main task completion orientation was challenged by their uncertainty towards the comparison task. Groups developed strategies to solve the task, showing, in a few cases, competency acquisition processes. Only a few differences were found between German and French students. Overall, implementing scientific literacy means to operate a shift in task culture at schools towards more open tasks aiming to enhance geographical competencies and argumentation.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference56 articles.

1. White, P.J., Ardoin, N.M., Eames, C., and Monroe, M.C. (2023). Agency in the Anthropocene: Supporting Document to the PISA 2025 Science Framework, OECD. OECD Education Working Papers.

2. Rychen, D., and Salganik, L. (2022, September 21). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf?_ga=2.268275273.674286943.1663773478-1082129267.1663773478.

3. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Science Framework, OECD.

4. Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science;Osborne;J. Res. Sci. Teach.,2004

5. Comparative Studies: Historical, Epistemological and Methodological Notes;Piovani;Educ. Real.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3