Advancing Middle Grade Research on Critical Pedagogy: Research Synthesis

Author:

Walker Amy1ORCID,Yoon Bogum2ORCID,Pankowski Jennifer3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Studies, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44240, USA

2. Department of Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA

3. School of Education, Pace University, New York, NY 10038, USA

Abstract

In this critical literature review, we examine how middle-level pedagogies, specifically critical pedagogies, impact students’ academic, physical, and socioemotional development. This literature review examines critical pedagogies research in middle-level education, focusing on methods that address systemic inequities and center diverse and historically marginalized student populations. Examining the literature from 2013 to 2023, key findings indicate that critical pedagogies, including culturally responsive teaching practices, diverse instructional approaches, and decolonial and antiracist strategies can impact student engagement and development. When used purposefully to foster equity, these approaches disrupt institutional power dynamics, promote social justice, and support diverse student needs. However, there is a lack of research on these pedagogies when in practice for a sustained amount of time, as well as a lack of inclusion of literature with student voices. Because of this, we call for future research to include the perspectives and voices of middle-level students to better understand and refine critical pedagogical practices.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Learning;Nanjundaswamy;Shanlax Int. J. Educ.,2021

2. Luke, A. (2018). Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice, Routledge.

3. Collins, P.H. (2019). Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Duke University Press.

4. (2023, December 01). Middle Level Teacher Preparation Standards with Rubrics and Supporting Explanations, Available online: http://www.amle.org/AboutAMLE/ProfessionalPreparation/AMLEStandards.aspx.

5. A Typology of Reviews; An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies;Grant;Health Inf. Libr. J.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3