Where Are the Costs? Using an Economic Analysis of Educational Interventions Approach to Improve the Evaluation of a Regional School Improvement Programme

Author:

Tiesteel Emma1,Watkins Richard C.12ORCID,Stringer Carys3ORCID,Grigorie Adina1,Sultana Fatema1,Hughes J. Carl1

Affiliation:

1. Collaborative Institute for Education Research, Evidence and Impact (CIEREI), School of Education, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, Wales, UK

2. GwE, North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Bryn Eirias, Colwyn Bay LL29 8BY, Wales, UK

3. Academy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing (AHEPW), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, Wales, UK

Abstract

Education systems are moving to a more evidence-informed paradigm to improve outcomes for learners. To help this journey to evidence, robust qualitative and quantitative research can help decisionmakers identify more promising approaches that provide value for money. In the context of the utilisation of scarce resources, an important source of evidence commonly used in health and social care research is an understanding of the economic impact of intervention choices. However, there are currently very few examples where these methodologies have been used to improve the evaluation of education interventions. In this paper we describe the novel use of an economic analysis of educational interventions (EAEI) approach to understand both the impact and the cost of activities in the evaluation of a formative assessment implementation project (FAIP) designed to improve teachers’ understanding and use of formative assessment strategies. In addition to utilizing a mixed method quasi-experimental design to explore the impact on learner wellbeing, health utility and attainment, we describe the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) to help decisionmakers understand the outcomes in the context of the resource costs that are a crucial element of robust evaluations. We also discuss the challenges of evaluating large-scale, universal educational interventions, including consideration of the economic tools needed to improve the quality and robustness of these evaluations. Finally, we discuss the importance of triangulating economic findings alongside other quantitative and qualitative information to help decisionmakers identify more promising approaches based on a wider range of useful information. We conclude with recommendations for more routinely including economic costs in education research, including the need for further work to improve the utility of economic methods.

Funder

Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarship (KESS), Wales

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference87 articles.

1. What is the evidence on the best way to get evidence into use in education?;Gorard;Rev. Educ.,2020

2. OECD (2022). Value for Money in School Education: Smart Investments, Quality Outcomes, Equal Opportunities, OECD Publishing.

3. Assessing the range and evidence-base of interventions in a cluster of schools;Pegram;Rev. Educ.,2022

4. How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education;Slavin;Educ. Psychol.,2020

5. Waiting for Godot: Cost-effectiveness analysis in education;Levin;New Dir. Eval.,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3