Developing Computational Thinking through Mathematics: An Evaluative Scientific Mapping

Author:

Ersozlu Zara1ORCID,Swartz Micah2ORCID,Skourdoumbis Andrew3

Affiliation:

1. Department of STEM Education, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2299, Australia

2. Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA

3. Department of Pedagogy and Curriculum, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has been accepted and embraced by educators and researchers alike, but many questions remain surrounding what concepts and topics have been used in CT, what tools have been used to help teach CT, and the current range of research on CT. In this paper, we address those questions and the state of professional development (PD) used to train teachers and preservice teachers in CT. Using a scientometrics analysis to map data from the scientific literature based on different kinds of published research, we found that most publications were published in education-related sources and that CT in relation to mathematics teaching was mostly about teaching computing skills and teaching computer programming using practice and algorithmic thinking in engineering and in STEM, mostly at the higher education level. Additionally, our results revealed that Scratch was the dominant tool used to teach programming skills at all school levels and in teacher education. Research on PD illustrated a main focus centred on improving computational thinking via programming skills in rural and urban areas of teaching. Lastly, we conclude that high-impact research outputs support the notion of computational thinking as a problem-solving process.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference61 articles.

1. A genealogy of the ‘future’: Antipodean trajectories and travels of the ‘21st century learner’;Williams;J. Educ. Policy,2013

2. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning;Harris;J. Res. Technol. Educ.,2009

3. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship;Ertmer;Comput. Educ.,2012

4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013). Australian Curriculum: Digital Technologies, Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

5. National Research Council (2010). Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking, National Academies Press.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3