A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
-
Published:2024-06-13
Issue:6
Volume:14
Page:636
-
ISSN:2227-7102
-
Container-title:Education Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Education Sciences
Author:
Ogunleye Bayode1ORCID, Zakariyyah Kudirat Ibilola1, Ajao Oluwaseun2, Olayinka Olakunle3, Sharma Hemlata4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Architecture, Technology & Engineering, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK 2. Department of Computing & Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK 3. School of Computer Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK 4. Department of Computing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 2NU, UK
Abstract
The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.
Reference69 articles.
1. Higher education assessment practice in the era of generative AI tools;Ogunleye;J. Appl. Learn. Teach. JALT,2024 2. Daun, M., and Brings, J. (2023, January 7–12). How ChatGPT Will Change Software Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Turku, Finland. 3. Brennan, J., Durazzi, N., and Sene, T. (2024, March 22). Things We Know and Don’t Know about the Wider Benefits of Higher Education: A Review of the Recent Literature, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/251011/bis-13-1244-things-we-know-and-dont-know-about-the-wider-benefits-of-higher-education.pdf. 4. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. 5. OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|