The Academic System Influence on Instructional Change: A Conceptual Systems Dynamics Model of Faculty Motivation to Adopt Research-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS)

Author:

Cruz-Bohorquez Juan Manuel1ORCID,Adams Stephanie G.2,Bravo Flor Angela3

Affiliation:

1. Experiential Engineering Education Department, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA

2. Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

3. Universidad Nacional de Colombia—Sede de La Paz, La Paz—Cesar 202017, Colombia

Abstract

Many universities have implemented initiatives to drive instructional change, yet their success has often been limited due to a lack of recognition of academia as a complex dynamic system. This paper explores how the interconnected and dynamic nature of academic systems influences faculty motivation to adopt instructional innovations, such as project-based learning (PBL) and small group collaborations (SGCs). We present a Conceptual Systems Dynamics Model (CSDM) that illustrates these interconnections, demonstrating how systemic factors create feedback loops that either reinforce or hinder faculty motivation, as well as other related factors. These loops, represented as Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs), were derived from literature reviews and qualitative data obtained from interviews and focus groups involving 17 faculty and administrators within an Engineering Department at a research university in South America. The paper identifies thirteen CLDs, comprising seven reinforcing dynamics that positively influence faculty motivation and six balancing dynamics that exert negative pressure. Using empirical evidence and analysis, we describe how the systemic factors influence faculty motivation, and how shifts in motivation reciprocally impact these interconnected factors. By elucidating the complex dynamics at play, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how to promote sustainable instructional change within academic institutions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference106 articles.

1. Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations;Henderson;Am. J. Phys. (Phys. Educ. Res. Sect.),2008

2. Jamieson, L.H., and Lohmann, J.R. (2009). Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education: Ensuring U.S. Engineering Has the Right People with the Right Talent for a Global Society, American Society of Engineering Education.

3. National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, National Academies Press.

4. Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning;Abrami;Educ. Psychol.,2004

5. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature;Henderson;J. Res. Sci. Teach.,2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3