Maintaining Tensions: Braiding as an Analogy for Mathematics Teacher Educators’ Political Work

Author:

Myers Marrielle1,Kokka Kari2ORCID,Gutiérrez Rochelle3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA

2. Department of Teaching and Learning, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

3. Department of Curriculum & Instruction, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA

Abstract

Although the field of mathematics education has made gains in centering the need for justice-oriented approaches and antiracist teaching practices in teacher education, much of this work remains in its infancy. Moreover, research focused on this area highlights teacher candidates’ knowledge and dispositions and often ignores the role of the mathematics teacher educators facilitating the process. We contend that mathematics teacher educators must pay more attention to how intersectional identities, contexts, Mirror Tests, and principles of Rehumanizing Mathematics manifest in teacher education to better understand how teacher candidates develop political knowledge in teaching mathematics. To this end, we introduce a framework of considerations, which we call a compass, that identifies four dimensions (or strands) and offers guiding questions for mathematics teacher educators to consider. We offer examples from a multi-site research study to illuminate each dimension and build the case for the necessity of braiding the four strands together as we engage in this line of work. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Funder

Spencer Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference42 articles.

1. Lerman, S. (1994). Cultural Perspectives on the Mathematics Classroom, Kluwer Academic.

2. Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning Mathematics: A Different Third r Radical Maths, Free Association Books.

3. On culture, geometrical thinking, and mathematics education;Gerdes;Educ. Stud. Math.,1988

4. Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism;Au;Educ. Policy,2016

5. Nasir, N.S., Cabana, C., Shreve, B., Woodbury, E., and Louie, N. (2014). Mathematics for Equity: A Framework for Successful Practice, Teachers College Press.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3