Affiliation:
1. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shangai 200093, China
Abstract
In the context of world education digitalization, the Chinese government has formulated China’s education digitalization strategy. The education digitalization policy tools of provincial governments are an important factor affecting the effectiveness of education digitalization policies. In this study, a text quantification and content analysis is conducted on educational digital policy documents released by eight provinces of China during the 14th Five-Year Plan period in China. This is based on a two-dimensional analysis framework of “instruments-value” using instrument types and policy principles, and NVivo software. The research outcomes reveal the following: (1) The distribution of educational digital policy instrument types is uneven, with an excess of supply-side instruments and a noticeable shortage of demand-side instruments. (2) Different policy instruments exhibit varying degrees of preference in implementing policy principles. There is a stronger emphasis on technology application and balanced development, while the emphasis on service principles promoting diverse participation is relatively weaker. (3) The policy instruments that facilitate interaction between policymakers and educational entities require further strengthening. In light of these findings, local governments in China should strengthen the use of demand-side policy instruments to achieve comprehensiveness and sustainability in educational digitalization. Policymakers should pay more attention to the demands of educational entities to shift educational digitalization from being technology driven to being demand driven. Furthermore, policy instrument selection should adhere to the value of serving and supporting individuals and reinforce the concept of multi-participation in their development, ultimately improving the precision and coordination of policies, and achieving a harmonious integration of technological and value aspects of policy instruments.
Funder
The Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
Reference38 articles.
1. (2023, May 12). The 2018 Digital University: Staying Relevant in the Digital Age. Available online: https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/the-2018-digital-university-staying-relevant-in-the-digital-age.pdf.
2. Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.-D., Infante-Moro, J.C., and Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable Management of Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Global Research Trends. Sustainability, 12.
3. Schmidt, J.T., and Tang, M. (2020). Führen und Managen in der Digitalen Transformation, Springer.
4. Mhlanga, D., and Moloi, T. (2020). COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation of Education: What Are We Learning on 4IR in South Africa?. Educ. Sci., 10.
5. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2022, September 10). Guidance on the Organization and Management of Online Teaching in Colleges and Universities during the Epidemic Prevention and Control Period, Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202002/t20200205_418138.html.