Re-Evaluating Components of Classical Educational Theories in AI-Enhanced Learning: An Empirical Study on Student Engagement
-
Published:2024-09-03
Issue:9
Volume:14
Page:974
-
ISSN:2227-7102
-
Container-title:Education Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Education Sciences
Author:
Bognár László1ORCID, Ágoston György1, Bacsa-Bán Anetta2, Fauszt Tibor3, Gubán Gyula2, Joós Antal1, Juhász Levente Zsolt2, Kocsó Edina2ORCID, Kovács Endre3, Maczó Edit2, Mihálovicsné Kollár Anita Irén1ORCID, Strauber Györgyi1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Information Technology, University of Dunaújváros, Táncsics M. Street 1/a, H-2400 Dunaújváros, Hungary 2. Teacher Training Center, University of Dunaújváros, Táncsics M. Street 1/a, H-2400 Dunaújváros, Hungary 3. Department of Business Information Technology, Budapest Business University, Buzogány u. 10-12, H-1149 Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
The primary goal of this research was to empirically identify and validate the factors influencing student engagement in a learning environment where AI-based chat tools, such as ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMs), are intensively integrated into the curriculum and teaching–learning process. Traditional educational theories provide a robust framework for understanding diverse dimensions of student engagement, but the integration of AI-based tools offers new personalized learning experiences, immediate feedback, and resource accessibility that necessitate a contemporary exploration of these foundational concepts. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was utilized to uncover the underlying factor structure within a large set of variables, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to verify the factor structure identified by EFA. Four new factors have been identified: “Academic Self-Efficacy and Preparedness”, “Autonomy and Resource Utilization”, “Interest and Engagement”, and “Self-Regulation and Goal Setting.” Based on these factors, a new engagement measuring scale has been developed to comprehensively assess student engagement in AI-enhanced learning environments.
Reference66 articles.
1. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., and Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, Pearson Education. 2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall. 3. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum. 4. Carver, C.S., and Scheier, M.F. (2017). Perspectives on Personality, Pearson. [8th ed.]. 5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W.H. Freeman.
|
|