Re-Evaluating Components of Classical Educational Theories in AI-Enhanced Learning: An Empirical Study on Student Engagement

Author:

Bognár László1ORCID,Ágoston György1,Bacsa-Bán Anetta2,Fauszt Tibor3,Gubán Gyula2,Joós Antal1,Juhász Levente Zsolt2,Kocsó Edina2ORCID,Kovács Endre3,Maczó Edit2,Mihálovicsné Kollár Anita Irén1ORCID,Strauber Györgyi1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Information Technology, University of Dunaújváros, Táncsics M. Street 1/a, H-2400 Dunaújváros, Hungary

2. Teacher Training Center, University of Dunaújváros, Táncsics M. Street 1/a, H-2400 Dunaújváros, Hungary

3. Department of Business Information Technology, Budapest Business University, Buzogány u. 10-12, H-1149 Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

The primary goal of this research was to empirically identify and validate the factors influencing student engagement in a learning environment where AI-based chat tools, such as ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMs), are intensively integrated into the curriculum and teaching–learning process. Traditional educational theories provide a robust framework for understanding diverse dimensions of student engagement, but the integration of AI-based tools offers new personalized learning experiences, immediate feedback, and resource accessibility that necessitate a contemporary exploration of these foundational concepts. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was utilized to uncover the underlying factor structure within a large set of variables, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to verify the factor structure identified by EFA. Four new factors have been identified: “Academic Self-Efficacy and Preparedness”, “Autonomy and Resource Utilization”, “Interest and Engagement”, and “Self-Regulation and Goal Setting.” Based on these factors, a new engagement measuring scale has been developed to comprehensively assess student engagement in AI-enhanced learning environments.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., and Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, Pearson Education.

2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall.

3. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum.

4. Carver, C.S., and Scheier, M.F. (2017). Perspectives on Personality, Pearson. [8th ed.].

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W.H. Freeman.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3