Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, Kings College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
Abstract
For several decades, universities have sought to promote better mental health amongst students. For example, universities now have formal institutional arrangements to postpone deadlines for students where there are mitigating circumstances, such as ill health. Such provisions might be understood as praiseworthy cases of institutional compassion. But, empirical research is needed to investigate how these measures play out in practice. This paper draws on ethnographic research in several UK universities to explore the experiences of staff responsible for the enactment of mitigating circumstance provisions. We find staff members sympathetic to the aims of the measures but also sceptical, and in some cases angry, because they find that the provisions have unwanted and undesirable effects. This paper uses the wider social science literature on bureaucracy to consider why this might be the case and raises questions about the capacity of institutions to enact ethical ideals.
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference32 articles.
1. Historicising the “Crisis” in Undergraduate Mental Health: British Universities and Student Mental Illness, 1944–1968;Crook;J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci.,2020
2. Universities UK (2020). Stepchange: Mentally Healthy Universitie, Universities UK.
3. Hughes, G.J., and Spanner, L. (2019). The University Mental Health Charter, Student Minds.
4. Healthy universities: An example of a whole-system health-promoting setting;Newton;Glob. Health Promot.,2016
5. Hordern, J. (2020). Compassion in Healthcare: Pilgrimage, Practice and Civic Life, Oxford University Press.