Affiliation:
1. College of Education, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA
2. Department of Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership, Binghamton University, Vestal, NY 13850, USA
Abstract
Calls for more integrated approaches to STEM have reached every sector of education, including formal and nonformal spaces, from early childhood to tertiary levels. The goal of STEM education as an integrated effort shifts beyond acquiring knowledge in any one or combination of STEM disciplines and, instead, focuses on designing solutions to complex, contextual problems that transcend disciplinary boundaries. To realize this goal, we first need to understand what transdisciplinary STEM might actually look and sound like in action, particularly in regard to the nature of student thinking. This paper addresses that need by investigating student reasoning during nonformal STEM-focused learning experiences. We chose four learning episodes, all involving elementary students working on engineering design tasks, to highlight the various ways transdisciplinary thinking might arise or not. In our analysis, we highlight factors that may have supported or hindered the integration of mathematical, scientific, technological, and engineering ways of thinking. For example, the nature of the task, materials provided, and level of adult support influenced the nature of student reasoning. Based on our findings, we provide suggestions for how to promote transdisciplinary thinking in both formal and nonformal spaces.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference46 articles.
1. National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research, National Academies Press.
2. Engaging students in STEM education;Kennedy;Sci. Educ. Int.,2014
3. K-12 STEM education: An overview of perspectives and considerations;Bryan;Hell. J. STEM Educ.,2020
4. Understanding early childhood engineering interest development as a family-level systems phenomenon: Findings from the head start on engineering project;Pattison;J. Precoll. Eng. Educ. Res.,2020
5. Children’s engineering identity development within an at-home engineering program during COVID-19;Simpson;J. Precoll. Eng. Educ. Res.,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献