A Scoping Review of Research on the Use of Digital Technologies for Teaching Reading Fluency

Author:

Oakley Grace1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Education, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia

Abstract

Background: Reading fluency is a crucial component of reading. Research indicates that the use of digital technologies can help students with reading difficulties and disabilities improve their reading fluency. Objectives: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and describe research focusing on the use of digital technologies for teaching reading fluency to primary or elementary students in English-speaking settings. Design: Online databases were used to identify papers published between 2013 and 2023. Eighty-six papers that met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. Results: The review indicates that research has primarily focused on the use of digital technologies as interventions to support students at risk of reading difficulties and students with disabilities, with relatively little research emphasis on general classroom teaching of reading fluency. Moreover, uses of digital technologies for the teaching of reading fluency could mostly be categorised as “enhancements” of common non-digital strategies for teaching reading fluency, such as explicit teaching, drill and practice, and repeated readings. Much of the research has focused on the use of programs as opposed to the innovative use of open-ended digital tools. Conclusions: This paper raises questions about the relatively narrow uses of digital technologies in the teaching and research of reading fluency and calls for an expanded research agenda to include a broader range of pedagogical goals and approaches.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference78 articles.

1. Why reading fluency should be hot!;Rasinski;Read. Teach.,2012

2. Hasbrouck, J., and Glaser, G. (2019). Reading Fluency: Understand—Assess—Teach, Benchmark Education Company.

3. NICHD (2000). National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction, National Institutes of Health.

4. Decoding, reading, and reading disability;Gough;RASE Remedial Spec. Educ.,1986

5. Neuman, S., and Dickinson, D. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilites: Evidence, theory, and practice. Handbook for Research in Early Literacy, Guilford Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3