ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?

Author:

Susnjak Teo1ORCID,McIntosh Timothy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand

2. School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Science, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia

Abstract

This study addresses the significant challenge posed by the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT on the integrity of online examinations, focusing on how these models can undermine academic honesty by demonstrating their latent and advanced reasoning capabilities. An iterative self-reflective strategy was developed for invoking critical thinking and higher-order reasoning in LLMs when responding to complex multimodal exam questions involving both visual and textual data. The proposed strategy was demonstrated and evaluated on real exam questions by subject experts and the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-4) with vision was estimated on an additional dataset of 600 text descriptions of multimodal exam questions. The results indicate that the proposed self-reflective strategy can invoke latent multi-hop reasoning capabilities within LLMs, effectively steering them towards correct answers by integrating critical thinking from each modality into the final response. Meanwhile, ChatGPT demonstrated considerable proficiency in being able to answer multimodal exam questions across 12 subjects. These findings challenge prior assertions about the limitations of LLMs in multimodal reasoning and emphasise the need for robust online exam security measures such as advanced proctoring systems and more sophisticated multimodal exam questions to mitigate potential academic misconduct enabled by AI technologies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference64 articles.

1. Barber, M., Bird, L., Fleming, J., Titterington-Giles, E., Edwards, E., and Leyland, C. (2024, April 16). Gravity Assist: Propelling Higher Education towards a Brighter Future: Report of the Digital Teaching and Learning Review [Barber Review]. Government Report. Available online: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:89765.

2. A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity;Crawford;Comput. Educ.,2020

3. Good proctor or “big brother”? Ethics of online exam supervision technologies;Coghlan;Philos. Technol.,2021

4. Factors associated with online examination cheating;Henderson;Assess. Eval. High. Educ.,2022

5. Academic leadership in the time of COVID-19—Experiences and perspectives;Dumulescu;Front. Psychol.,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From GPT-3.5 to GPT-4.o: A Leap in AI’s Medical Exam Performance;Information;2024-09-05

2. Gender Prediction of Generated Tweets Using Generative AI;Information;2024-08-01

3. Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT by University and High School Students;2024 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI);2024-05-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3