Secondary School Teachers’ Educational Philosophies: Differences Regarding Work Experience, Type of School, and Education Programs

Author:

Ćavar Sani1ORCID,Jukić Tonća1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia

Abstract

Teachers’ educational philosophies have a great influence on teachers’ actions in the classroom. They are partly influenced by the dominant pedagogical paradigm expressed in the strategic educational documents, but there are also some other factors that influence teachers’ educational philosophies. This research aimed to determine secondary school teachers’ educational philosophies and whether they differ in relation to a teacher’s work experience, type of school, and educational program. A total of 355 secondary school teachers in Split–Dalmatia County in the Republic of Croatia participated in the research. The philosophy preference assessment scale consisting of two subscales (traditional and contemporary educational philosophies), was applied. The results showed that: secondary school teachers generally agreed more with contemporary than traditional educational philosophies; grammar school teachers agreed more with contemporary and vocational school teachers with traditional educational philosophies; the education program was a significant factor only for the subscale of traditional educational philosophies; and years of work experience was not a significant factor for either subscale. The results are discussed in the context of the relationship between teachers’ educational philosophies, values, beliefs, and teaching experiences and the need for teachers to raise awareness of their educational philosophies and continuously compare and harmonise them with their educational practice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference71 articles.

1. (2024, April 04). The European Qualifications Framework. Available online: https://europass.europa.eu/en/europass-digital-tools/european-qualifications-framework.

2. (2024, April 04). Croatian Qualifications Framework. Available online: http://www.kvalifikacije.hr/en.

3. (2024, April 04). Referencing and Self-Certification Report of the Croatian Qualifications Framework to the European Qualifications Framework and to the Qualifications Framework of the European Higher Education Area 2014. Available online: http://www.kvalifikacije.hr/sites/default/files/documents-publications/2018-02/Referencing%20and%20Self-certification%20report%20of%20the%20CROQF%20to%20the%20EQF%20and%20to%20the%20QF-EHEA.pdf.

4. (2024, April 04). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December for Lifelong Learning (2006/962/EC). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF.

5. Key Competences for Lifelong Learning (2024, April 04). European Reference Framework Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2007. Available online: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/youth-in-action-keycomp-en.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3