First Year Engineering Students’ Difficulties with Math Courses- What Is the Starting Point for Academic Teachers?
-
Published:2023-08-16
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:835
-
ISSN:2227-7102
-
Container-title:Education Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Education Sciences
Author:
Charalambides Marios1, Panaoura Rita2, Tsolaki Eleni3, Pericleous Savvas4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Business Administration, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus 2. Department of Education, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus 3. Department of Maritime Transport and Commerce, Frederick University, Limassol 3080, Cyprus 4. Department of Computer Science, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus
Abstract
The discussion about first-year engineering students’ difficulties in mathematics is continuous in the fields of engineering, mathematics and higher education. The present study aimed to examine the initial barriers academic math teachers need to have in mind if they want to improve students’ performance in engineering math courses through appropriate teaching practices in order to face their initial interindividual differences. During the first phase of the study, we examined first year engineering students’ initial beliefs about the nature of mathematics, their self-efficacy beliefs about mathematics and their basic mathematical knowledge. The math school grade was used for their previous mathematical performance. Results indicated the predominant role of the previous mathematical knowledge and the important role of the formalistic disposition toward mathematics. The lack of experience of using mathematics for problem-solving situations within an engineering framework prevented students from recognizing and appreciating the value of mathematical courses during the engineering studies. The second phase of the study examined, through an interview with a group of students, their perceptions of the teaching practices which were introduced after their teacher attended a training program. The discussion concentrates on how academics can use teaching processes for equity and not equality in order to motivate their students.
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference30 articles.
1. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., and Marshall, S. (2009). A Handbook for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, Routledge. [3rd ed.]. 2. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., and Marshall, S. (2008). A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Routledge. 3. Santos, A., Gausas, S., Mackeviciute, R., Jotautyte, A., and Martinaitis, Z. (2022, January 04). Innovating Professional Development in Higher Education. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/iptiptwpa/jrc115595.htm. 4. Pleschova, G., Simon, E., Quinlan, K.M., Murphy, J., Roxa, T., and Szabo, M. (2013). The Professionalisation of Academics as Teachers in Higher Education, European Science Foundation. Available online: http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/professionalisation_academics.pdf. 5. Mathematics in Engineering Education: A review of the recent literature with a view towards innovative practices;Pepin;Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Educ.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|