Using Cooperative Learning to Enhance Students’ Learning and Engagement during Inquiry-Based Science

Author:

Gillies Robyn M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

Abstract

Much attention over the last two decades has been given to inquiry-based learning in science as a way of capturing students’ interest and participation in learning. However, while the research on inquiry-based learning consistently demonstrates that students do attain higher learning outcomes than peers who are taught by traditional transmission approaches, little research has been attached to researching the key elements of this approach that contribute to its success. This review focuses on the role of inquiry-based learning where students work in cooperative groups to investigate topics that challenge their curiosity, encouraging them to ask questions to clarify their understandings, evaluate evidence that may help to explain phenomena, and predict potential solutions to the problems at hand. The key role teachers play in inducting students into ways of thinking and reasoning and providing opportunities for them to work with others in the context of inquiry-based learning will also be discussed.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference39 articles.

1. National Research Council (NRC) (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, National Academy of Sciences.

2. Llewellyn, D. (2014). Inquire Within: Implementing Inquiry and Argument-Based Science Standards in Grades 3–8, Corwin.

3. Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice;Crawford;J. Res. Sci. Teach.,2007

4. Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design;Metz;Cogn. Instr.,2004

5. Tobias, S., and Duffy, T. (2009). Constructivist Instruction: Success of Failure?, Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3