Affiliation:
1. Biomedical Communications, Department of Biology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
Abstract
Visual representations are essential to scientific research and teaching, playing a role in conceptual understanding, knowledge generation, and the communication of discovery and change. Undergraduate students are expected to interpret, use, and create visual representations so they can make their thinking explicit when engaging in discourse with the scientific community. Despite the importance of visualization in the biosciences, students often learn visualization skills in an ad hoc fashion without a clear framework. We used a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study design to explore and assess the pedagogical needs of undergraduate biology students (n = 53), instructors (n = 13), and teaching assistants (n = 8) in visual science communication education. Key themes were identified using inductive grounded theory methods. We found that extrinsic motivations, namely time, financial resources, and grading practices, contribute to a lack of guidance, support, and structure as well as ambiguous expectations and standards perceived by students and instructors. Biology and science visualization instructors cite visual communication assessments as a way of developing and evaluating students’ higher-order thinking skills in addition to their communication competencies. An output of this research, the development of a learning module, the Visual Science Communication Toolkit, is discussed along with design considerations for developing resources for visual science communication education.
Funder
US National Science Foundation
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Partnership Development
Reference114 articles.
1. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition;Burns;Public Underst. Sci.,2003
2. Taking Stock and Re-Examining the Role of Science Communication;Roche;Front. Environ. Sci.,2021
3. Tornasi, Z., and Delaney, N. (2020). Science Communication—Achievements in Horizon 2020 and Recommendations on the Way Forward, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/518359.
4. Illingworth, S., and Allen, G. (2020). Effective Science Communication, IOP Publishing. [2nd ed.].
5. Why Science Communication, and Does It Work?: A Taxonomy of Science Communication Aims and a Survey of the Empirical Evidence;Kappel;Front. Commun.,2019