A Qualitative-Content-Analytical Approach to the Quality of Primary Students’ Questions: Testing a Competence Level Model and Exploring Selected Influencing Factors

Author:

Schilling Yannick1ORCID,Hillebrand Leonie1,Kuckuck Miriam2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography and General Studies, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany

2. Didactics of General Studies, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany

Abstract

There is a consensus on the importance of students’ questions in educational contexts due to diverse potentials to promote learning. Engaging with students’ questions in primary school is highly relevant as it fosters critical thinking skills, encourages curiosity, and cultivates a deeper understanding of subject matter. At the same time, research findings agree that students’ questions about the subject matter are rare. Research on the quality of students’ questions in the classroom mostly focuses on secondary or higher education. However, when it comes to the quality of students’ questions in primary schools, there is a research gap, although it is possible to use questions in primary school lessons to improve learning processes. Against this background, the present study takes up a competence level model for assessing the quality of students’ questions in General Studies and evaluates its use in a qualitative–explorative setting on the questions from a non-probabilistic random sample (n = 477). The results of the analysis are further used to look for indications of the influences of the grade level and the subject matter on competence levels. Further, they also allow conclusions to be drawn for primary school teacher education. The competence level model in modified form turns out to be a reliable instrument for assessing the competence levels of questions. In addition, a weak positive correlation was found between the level of competence levels and the students’ grade level. The conclusion is that there is a need for tailored support across different grade levels. The detected lack of consistent connection with the subject matter highlights the importance of diverse instructional approaches.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3