On the Nature and Utility of Crosscutting Concepts

Author:

Nordine Jeffrey Carl1ORCID,Lee Okhee2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

2. Department of Teaching and Learning, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA

Abstract

The crosscutting concepts (CCCs) are a collection of ideas that span the science and engineering disciplines. While various standards documents have identified similar sets of ideas in the past, calls for their explicit inclusion into science and engineering instruction began in earnest only about a decade ago. When these calls began, the research base on the teaching and learning of the CCCs was limited; in the intervening years, educators have debated whether and how the CCCs are useful for supporting science and engineering learners. In this article, we summarize a recent scholarship that has clarified the role of CCCs in supporting science and engineering learning. Then, we highlight two exemplary curricular units (one elementary and one secondary) that showcase CCC-informed instruction. Based upon these research and development efforts, we identify three core messages: (1) CCCs provide learners with a set of complementary lenses on phenomena, (2) CCCs are powerful tools for broadening access to science and engineering, and (3) practitioner innovations play an especially important role in the time-sensitive work of establishing a more robust research base for how CCCs can strengthen science and engineering teaching and learning.

Funder

US National Science Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference25 articles.

1. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, The National Academies Press.

2. (2023, May 01). NGSS Lead States Next Generation Science Standards. Available online: www.nextgenscience.org.

3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Oxford University Press.

4. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, National Academies Press.

5. (2005). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz—Bildungsstandards im Fach Physik für den Mittleren Schulabschluss (Jahrgangsstufe 10) [Report of the Cultural Ministry Conference—Education Standards in the Subject Physics for the Completion of Middle School (Grade 10)], Luchterhand. Available online: https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Bildungsstandards-Physik-Mittleren-SA.pdf.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. OSM: Leveraging model checking for observing dynamic behaviors in aspect-oriented applications;Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies;2023-10-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3