Ungrading: The Case for Abandoning Institutionalized Assessment Protocols and Improving Pedagogical Strategies

Author:

Crogman Horace T.1ORCID,Eshun Kwame O.2,Jackson Maury3,TrebeauCrogman Maryam A.4,Joseph Eugene5,Warner Laurelle C.6,Erenso Daniel B.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics, Californian State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA

2. Department of Biology, Sierra College, Rocklin, CA 95677, USA

3. HMS Richards Divinity School, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 92505, USA

4. Department of Psychology, Californian State Polytechnic University Pomona, Pomona, CA 91768, USA

5. Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 92505, USA

6. Department of Social Work, Walla Walla University, Missoula, MT 59808, USA

7. Department of Physics, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37130, USA

Abstract

Our current grading system assumes everyone starts at approximately the same place. This assumption presumes uniformity and impartiality to be inherent in our school system. We argue that this is not the case. This work explores the evolution of grading systems and the integration of new technologies in education, focusing on the development of more inclusive, dynamic, and adaptable teaching and assessment strategies. Key methods include diversified assessments, experiential learning approaches such as problem-based learning and the generated question learning model, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in hyperflex learning strategies. The proposed work astutely identifies the critical flaws within the modern grading system and puts forth a compelling solution: shifting the focus towards assessing students’ improvement scores. This approach not only offers a progressive path forward, but also significantly enhances equity by holding students accountable for their knowledge gaps while promoting a more comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, creative engagement techniques, such as mock banking reward systems, are employed to enhance student motivation and participation. AI-facilitated formative assessments and personalized learning plans are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of real-time insights into student progress and the provision of flexible personalized learning environments. This comprehensive approach to education fosters student ownership of learning, promotes active participation, and equips students with essential lifelong learning skills. Moreover, a more accurate assessment of student learning and progress would be fostered, thus creating a paradigm shift from the currently flawed grading system.

Funder

US Department of Education

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference69 articles.

1. Blum, S.D. (2020). Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (And What to do Instead), West Virginia University Press.

2. (2023, May 15). Box Office Mojo. Available online: https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1584629249/weekend/.

3. Teaching more by grading less (or differently);Schinske;CBE—Life Sci. Educ.,2014

4. Case Against Grades;Kohn;Educ. Leadersh.,2011

5. An A is not an A is not an A: A history of grading;Durm;Educ. Forum,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3