Reliability and Validity of the Four Station Fundamental Motor Test (4-SFMT) for Assessing Motor Skills in Preschool Children—A Pilot Study
-
Published:2023-03-15
Issue:3
Volume:13
Page:306
-
ISSN:2227-7102
-
Container-title:Education Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Education Sciences
Author:
Pavletić Leutar Petra1, Krstulović Saša1, De Giorgio Andrea2ORCID, Kuvačić Goran1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia 2. Faculty of Psychology, eCampus University, 22060 Novedrate, Italy
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to create a new test to assess the motor skills of children of preschool and early school age and to determine its reliability and validity. Thirty children (5–6 years old) were tested on two occasions 14 days apart. The testing procedures included measuring the participants’ performance on the Four Station Fundamental Motor Test (4-SFMT). The newly constructed 4-SFMT tested four fundamental skills/tasks: space covering (ROLL), overcoming resistance (PULL), object control (BALL), and overcoming obstacles (CLIMB). The performance was evaluated with a 22-point scale with different criteria for each skill, and the time taken to perform the test was measured. The concurrent validity was assessed by determining the correlation with a Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2). The level of agreement across trials was statistically significant for all three raters, with two variables presenting excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9) and two variables having good reliability (ICC > 0.75 and <0.9). No significant differences were found between the test and retest scores, indicating the test’s high reliability. A factor analysis isolated only one motor factor (accounting for 43.99% of the variance with the eigenvalue of 1.768) from the four tasks. There was a large correlation (r = −0.576, p < 0.01) between the process- and product-oriented assessments of the 4-SFMT. Moreover, significant correlations were found between the 4-SFMT and TGMD-2 regarding the scores (r = 0.824, p < 0.001) and time taken to perform the tasks (r = −0.652, p < 0.001), which indicates the good concurrent validity of the newly constructed test. Small to moderate correlations between tasks (0.016 to 0.497) and no differences between boys and girls in the total score (p = 0.943) and time taken to complete the tasks (p = 0.49) were determined. The 4-SFMT appears to be a valid and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate motor skills performance in children between the ages of 5 and 6 and is reasonably simple to use.
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference48 articles.
1. Gallahue, D.L., Ozmun, J.C., and Goodway, J. (2012). Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults, McGraw-Hill. [7th ed.]. 2. Haywood, K., and Getchell, N. (2019). Life Span Motor Development, Human Kinetics. [7th ed.]. 3. Preschool Children’s Fundamental Motor Skills: A Review of Significant Determinants;Iivonen;Early Child Dev. Care,2014 4. Newman, B., and Newman, P. (2017). Development Through Life: A Psychosocial Approach, Cengage Learning. [13th ed.]. 5. Relationship Between Fundamental Motor Skill Competence and Physical Activity During Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review;Logan;Kinesiol. Rev.,2015
|
|