Life Cycle Assessment of Luminescent Solar Concentrators Integrated into a Smart Window
Author:
Muteri Vincenzo1, Longo Sonia1ORCID, Traverso Marzia2ORCID, Palumbo Elisabetta3ORCID, Bua Letizia4ORCID, Cellura Maurizio1, Testa Daniele4, Guarino Francesco1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed.9, 90128 Palermo, Italy 2. Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering (INaB), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany 3. Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences (DISA), University of Bergamo, 24129 Bergamo, Italy 4. Eni S.p.A., Renewable Energy, Magnetic Fusion and Material Science Research Center, Via G. Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, Italy
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to assess the life cycle environmental impacts of a multifunctional smart window luminescent solar concentrator (SW–LSC) prototype through the application of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology. To the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies on the topic. The analysis followed a cradle to gate approach, considering the assembly and maintenance phase as well as the end of life, examined separately through a recycling/landfill scenario. A comparison of the impacts of LSC modules with those of some building-integrated photovoltaic technologies was carried out. Results showed that the global warming potential (100 years) for SW–LSC was 5.91 × 103 kg CO2eq and the manufacturing phase had the greatest impact (about 96%). The recycling/landfill scenario results showed the possibility to reduce impacts by an average of 45%. A dominance analysis of SW–LSC components showed that the aluminum frame was the main hotspot (about 60% contribution), followed by the light-shelf (about 19%). Batteries and motors for the shading system were the biggest contributors in the abiotic depletion potential category (36% and 30%, respectively). An alternative scenario, which involved the use of 75% recycled aluminum for the window frame, highlighted the possibility to reduce environmental impacts from 3% to 46%. Finally, the comparison results showed that the LSC modules’ impacts were on average 870% lower than that of various PV technologies when compared on the basis of m2; on the contrary, LSC modules had the highest impacts in all categories (from 200% to 1900%) when compared with other PV technologies on the basis of 1 kWh of energy generated. The results could be used for the definition of eco-design strategies for the examined device, in order to support the scaling-up process and to put “greener” systems onto the market.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference39 articles.
1. European Commission (2013). GREEN PAPER—A 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies. 2. Abergel, T., Dean, B., and Dulac, J. (2017). Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient, and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector—GLOBAL STATUS REPORT 2017, UNEP. 3. Fenestration of today and tomorrow: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities;Petter;Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells,2012 4. Hermelink, A., Schimschar, S., Boermans, T., Pagliano, L., Zangheri, P., Armani, R., Voss, K., and Musall, E. (2013). Towards Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings Definition of Common Principles under the EPBD, ECOFYS. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/nzeb_full_report.pdf. 5. A comprehensive analysis on definitions, development, and policies of nearly zero energy buildings in China;Liu;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|