Alternative Excipients for Protein Stabilization in Protein Therapeutics: Overcoming the Limitations of Polysorbates

Author:

Castañeda Ruiz Angel J.,Shetab Boushehri Maryam A.,Phan Tamara,Carle Stefan,Garidel Patrick,Buske Julia,Lamprecht Alf

Abstract

Given their safety and efficiency in protecting protein integrity, polysorbates (PSs) have been the most widely used excipients for the stabilization of protein therapeutics for years. In recent decades, however, there have been numerous reports about visible or sub-visible particles in PS-containing biotherapeutic products, which is a major quality concern for parenteral drugs. Alternative excipients that are safe for parenteral administration, efficient in protecting different protein drugs against various stress conditions, effective in protein stabilization in high-concentrated liquid formulations, stable under the storage conditions for the duration of the product’s shelf-life, and compatible with other formulation components and the primary packaging are highly sought after. The aim of this paper is to review potential alternative excipients from different families, including surfactants, carbohydrate- and amino acid-based excipients, synthetic amphiphilic polymers, and ionic liquids that enable protein stabilization. For each category, important characteristics such as the ability to stabilize proteins against thermal and mechanical stresses, current knowledge related to the safety profile for parenteral administration, potential interactions with other formulation components, and primary packaging are debated. Based on the provided information and the detailed discussion thereof, this paper may pave the way for the identification or development of efficient excipients for biotherapeutic protein stabilization.

Funder

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science

Reference414 articles.

1. The Process Defines the Product: What Really Matters in Biosimilar Design and Production?;Vulto;Rheumatology,2017

2. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) (2019). What Are “Biologics” Questions and Answers, FDA, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

3. Therapeutic Proteins;Dimitrov;Methods Mol. Biol.,2012

4. Identification of Sites of Degradation in a Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody by Peptide Mapping;Kroon;Pharm Res.,1992

5. Characterization of a Novel Modification to Monoclonal Antibodies: Thioether Cross-Link of Heavy and Light Chains;Tous;Anal. Chem.,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3