Comparison of Downstream Processing of Nanocrystalline Solid Dispersion and Nanosuspension of Diclofenac Acid to Develop Solid Oral Dosage Form

Abstract

The conventional “top-down”, “bottom-up” and “combination” approaches of generating drug nanocrystals produce a “nanosuspension” (NS). It requires significant downstream processing for drying the liquid by suitable means followed by its granulation to develop an oral solid dosage form (OSD). In this paper, we used a novel, spray drying-based NanoCrySP technology for the generation of drug nanocrystals in the form of nanocrystalline solid dispersion (NCSD). We hypothesized that the NCSD would require minimal downstream processing since the nanocrystals are obtained in powder form during spray drying. We further compared downstream processing of NS and NCSD of diclofenac acid (DCF) prepared by wet media milling and NanoCrySP technology, respectively. The NS and NCSD were characterized for crystallinity, crystal size, assay and dissolution. The NCSD was physically mixed with 0.3% Aerosil® 200, 1.76% croscarmellose sodium (CCS) and 0.4% sodium stearyl fumarate (SSF) and filled into size 0 hard gelatin capsules. The NS was first wet granulated using Pearlitol® SD 200 (G1 granules) and Celphere® 203 (G2 granules) in a fluidized bed processor, and the resulting granules were mixed using the same extra granular excipients as NCSD and filled into capsules. A discriminatory dissolution method was developed to monitor changes in dissolution behavior due to crystal growth during processing. Cost analysis and comparison of process efficiency was performed using an innovation radar tool. The NS and NCSD were successfully fabricated with a crystal size of 363 ± 21.87 and 361.61 ± 11.78, respectively. In comparison to NCSD-based capsules (65.13%), the G1 and G2 granules showed crystal growth and decrease in dissolution to 52.68% and 48.37%, respectively, in 120 min. The overall cost for downstream processing of NCSD was up to 80% lower than that of NS. An innovation radar tool also concluded that the one-step NanoCrySP technology was more efficient and required less downstream processing than the two-step wet media milling approach for conversion of nanocrystals to OSD.