A Buffered Local Anesthetic Without Epinephrine: Development, Characterization, and In Vivo Efficacy and Toxicity Analysis

Author:

Uzbelger Feldman Daniel1ORCID,Laun Billy B.2ORCID,Patel Chirag3,Pande Sonal V.3,Boddu Sai H. S.45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Endodontology, Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry, 3223 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA

2. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Carbondale, 1111 E. Walnut St Suite B, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA

3. Department of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380009, India

4. Center of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates

5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine (LW/E) is widely used to prevent pain during dental procedures and has been associated with injection sting, jittering effects, slow onset, and a bitter aftertaste. Since LW/E’s introduction in 1948, no significant modifications have been proposed. This study aims to design and characterize an improved dental lidocaine HCl injectable formulation without epinephrine (LW/O/E) via buffers, sweeteners, and amino acids. LW/O/E injections were prepared with pH and osmolality values of 6.5–7.0 and 590–610 mOsm/kg. Using the electronic tongue (ETongue), the LW/O/E injectable formulations were characterized for viscosity, injectability, and taste analysis. The results were compared with the LW/E control. In vivo efficacy and anesthetic duration of the samples were measured through radiant heat tail-flick latency (RHTFL) and hot plate (HP) tests and local toxicity was assessed after a single intra-oral injection in Sprague Dawley rats (SDR). The viscosity and injectability values of the LW/O/E samples were found to be comparable to the LW/E injection. ETongue taste analysis showed an improvement in bitterness reduction of the LW/O/E samples compared to the LW/E formulation. Toxicity studies of samples in SDR showed minor and transient signs of erythema/eschar and edema. Anesthetic duration via RHTFL and HP paw withdrawal latency time in SDR were found to be comparable for the LW/O/E Sample 3A and the LW/E injection (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the buffered, higher osmolality and reduced bitterness developed LW/O/E formulation (Sample 3A) could be considered a promising alternative to the LW/E formulation for dental use.

Funder

Neocaine, LLC. Charlotte, NC, USA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

1. Current treatments and advances in pain and anxiety management;Huang;Dent. Clin. N. Am.,2011

2. Quantification of patient fears regarding dental injectons and patient perceptions of a local noninjectable anesthetic gel;Crawford;Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.,2005

3. A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States;Kohli;Pediatr. Dent.,2001

4. The prevalence, causes, and relativity of dental anxiety in adult patients to irregular dental visits;Gaffar;Saudi Med. J.,2014

5. Malamed, S. (2019). Handbook of Local Anesthesia-Mosby, Elsevier.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3