Abstract
Oglala Lakota ethos manifests a pre-Socratic/Heideggerian variant of ethos: ethos as “haunt”. Within this alternative to the Aristotelian ethos-as-character, Oglala ethos marks out the “dwelling place” of the Oglala Lakota people. That is, the Oglala Lakota ground their cultural- and self-identity in the land: their ethology, in effect, expresses an ecology. Thus, an Oglala Lakotan ethos cannot be understood apart from its nation’s understanding of the natural world—of its primacy and sacredness. A further aspect of the Oglala Lakotan ethos rests in the nation’s history of conflict with EuroAmericans. Through military conflict, forced displacement, and material/economic exploitation of reservation lands, an Oglala Lakota ethos bears within itself a woundedness that continues to this day. Only through an understanding of ethos-as-haunt, of cultural trauma or woundedness, and of the ways of healing can Oglala Lakota ethos be fully appreciated.
Reference56 articles.
1. The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique 20 (Winter) (1991–1992)https://www. jstor.org/stable/1354221
2. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity;Alexander,2004
3. On Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse,1991
4. On the Psychology of the Pisteis: Mapping the Terrains of Mind and Rhetoric;Baumlin,1994
5. Positioning Ethos in/for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction to Histories of Ethos
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献