Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of several factors related to manufacturing, design, and post-processing on the dimensional accuracy of holes built in the additively manufactured parts obtained by material extrusion process (MEX). Directly fabricated holes in the 3D prints are commonly used for joining with other parts by means of mechanical fasteners, thus producing assemblies or larger parts, or have other functional purposes such as guiding the drill in the case of patient-personalized surgical guides. However, despite their spread use and importance, the relationship between the 3D-printed holes’ accuracy and printing settings is not well documented in the literature. Therefore, in this research, test parts were manufactured by varying the number of shells, printing speed, layer thickness, and axis orientation angles for evaluating their effect on the dimensional accuracy of holes of different diameters. In the same context of limited existing information, the influence of material, 3D printer, and slicing software is also investigated for determining the dimensional accuracy of hole-type features across different manufacturing sites, a highly relevant aspect when using MEX to produce spare or end-use parts in a delocalized production paradigm. The results of this study indicated that the layer thickness is the most relevant influence factor for the diameter accuracy, followed by the number of shells around the holes. Considering the tested values, the optimal set of values found as optimizing the accuracy and printing time was 0.2 mm layer thickness, two shells, and 50 mm/s printing speed for the straight holes. Data on the prints manufactured on different MEX equipment and slicers indicated no statistically significant difference between the diameters of the holes. The evaluation of 3D-printed polylactic acid test parts mimicking a surgical template device with inclined holes showed that the medical decontamination process had more impact on the holes’ dimensional variability than on their dimensional accuracy.
Funder
National Research Council
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle;Rachel;Oper. Res. Perspect.,2021
2. Sun, H., Zheng, H., Sun, X., and Li, W. (2022). Customized Investment Decisions for New and Remanufactured Products Supply Chain Based on 3D Printing Technology. Sustainability, 14.
3. Effect of 3D printing on supply chain management;Varsha;Mater. Today Proc.,2020
4. Application of 3D printing and distributed manufacturing during the first-wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience at a third-level university hospital;3D Print. Med.,2021
5. Willemsen, K., Magré, J., Mol, J., Noordmans, H.J., Weinans, H., Hekman, E.E.G., and Kruyt, M.C. (2022). Vital Role of In-House 3D Lab to Create Unprecedented Solutions for Challenges in Spinal Surgery, Practical Guidelines and Clinical Case Series. J. Pers. Med., 12.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献