Glycemic Management by a Digital Therapeutic Platform across Racial/Ethnic Groups: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Gershoni TamarORCID,Ritholz Marilyn D.ORCID,Horwitz David L.ORCID,Manejwala OmarORCID,Donaldson-Pitter Trisha,Fundoiano-Hershcovitz YifatORCID

Abstract

Significant racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare and diabetes technology use have been observed in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which are associated with nonengagement in diabetes self-management and out-of-range glycemia. This study aimed to assess whether there were differences in the blood glucose levels achieved by several racial/ethnic groups using the same digital tool. Study objectives were to determine whether engagement with the digital tool and blood glucose levels differ among ethnic groups, and to determine whether any differences in the in-target-glycemia are related to engagement levels. The retrospective real-world analysis followed a group of 1000 people with Type 2 diabetes who used the DarioTM digital therapeutic platform over 12 months. Participants included in the study had a blood glucose average > 180 mg/dL (hyperglycemia, high-risk) in their first month. The differences between/within the groups’ average blood glucose level (Avg.bg) and glycemic variability were evaluated. Furthermore, three general linear models were constructed to predict the Avg.bg by the number of blood glucose measurements (Bgm) in Model 1 (with the moderator White persons (WP)/people from racial and ethnic minority groups (REM)) and by the frequency of measurements by months (F.m) within REM and WP in Model 2 and Model 3, respectively. The Avg.bg was significantly reduced in each group over a year with no differences between REM/WP users. Blood glucose measurements in Model 1 and frequency of measurements by months in Model 2 and Model 3 predicted the Avg.bg (β1 = −0.20, p = 0.045; β2 = −4.38, p = 0.009; β3= −3.77, p < 0.001, respectively). Findings indicate a positive association between digital engagement and glycemia, with no differences between REM and WP participants.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference67 articles.

1. Global trends in diabetes complications: A review of current evidence;Harding;Diabetologia,2019

2. CAPTURE: A multinational, cross-sectional study of cardiovascular disease prevalence in adults with type 2 diabetes across 13 countries;Mosenzon;Cardiovasc. Diabetol.,2021

3. (2022, July 07). Coexisting Conditions and Complications|Diabetes|CDC. (January 19 2022), Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/coexisting-conditions-complications.html.

4. Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes–Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends;Khan;J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health,2020

5. (2022, July 27). National Diabetes Statistics Report|Diabetes|CDC. (2022, January 20), Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3