The Pilgrim’s Progress or Regress? The Case of Transhumanism and Deification

Author:

Kornu Kimbell1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of the Provost, Thomas F. Frist, Jr. College of Medicine, School of Theology and Christian Ministry, Belmont University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA

Abstract

Transhumanism presents a view of human progress by transcending the human, regarding finitude and suffering to be fundamental problems that must be overcome by radical bioenhancement technologies. Recent theologians have compared Christianity and transhumanism as competing deifications via grace and technology, respectively. Ron Cole-Turner is a cautious yet optimistic interpreter of the relationship between Christian deification and transhumanism, regarding them, on the one hand, to be incompatible based on self-centeredness vs. kenosis, while on the other hand, they can be compatible through a robust theology of creation and transfiguration such that creative human efforts via technology will be an active agent in transforming the world in glory. In this way, Christian transhumanism offers a vision of human progress in deification that transfigures creation through technology. In this paper, I challenge this proposal. I wish to show how transhumanism in any stripe, whether secular, Christian, or other, is fundamentally incompatible with Christian deification for two reasons: (1) incompatible views of progress and (2) incompatible views of human agency in deification. I will address each in turn. I then propose that human progress is infinite growth in the love of Christ. Finally, I suggest how a view of human agency affects how we think about suffering as a means to human progress.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference40 articles.

1. Heller, Michael, and Woodin, W. Hugh (2011). Infinity as a Transformative Concept in Science and Theology. Infinity: New Research Frontiers, Cambridge University Press.

2. The Misnomer of Transhumanism as Directed Evolution;Askland;International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society,2011

3. Silverthorne, Michael (2000). The New Organon, Cambridge University Press.

4. Daley, Brian E. (2003). Cosmic Liturgy: The Universe According to Maximus the Confessor, Ignatius Press.

5. Blackwell, Ben C. (2016). Christosis: Engaging Paul’s Soteriology with His Patristic Interpreters, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. [Rev. ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3